This looks inter alia at whether everything must be something, and at metaphysical questions such as ‘Everything and Nothing’. Heidegger talks about ‘nothing’ or ‘all’ in his philosophy. Nothing is contradictory, ineffable and the ground of everything. Husserl also had this way of looking at things. Anything can be a thing (anything) and it can be a quantifier or a substantive, or it can be both. Parts overlap. Some objects do not exist but are postulated. The mereological sum of a bunch of objects is you get when you put those things together
Latest Articles
- Supersolids and Entanglement
- Remote Viewing Astral Travel
- Are You Undergoing a Divorce?
- Have you Suffered a Bereavement?
- A Further Thought by Brian Mayne
- Mark Twain’s Thinking on Reflection
- A snapshot of Brian Mayne’s thinking about the ‘presence’ that underlies our essence,
- A Contemplation
- An example of intellectual reflection brought to bear on ruminative reflection
- Reflection Represented in Figurine Form
- What can we be sure of?
- Review: Ghosts and Hauntings by Dennis Bardens
- The Underlying Approach to Reflection
- Driifloat
- On Science