This looks inter alia at whether everything must be something, and at metaphysical questions such as ‘Everything and Nothing’. Heidegger talks about ‘nothing’ or ‘all’ in his philosophy. Nothing is contradictory, ineffable and the ground of everything. Husserl also had this way of looking at things. Anything can be a thing (anything) and it can be a quantifier or a substantive, or it can be both. Parts overlap. Some objects do not exist but are postulated. The mereological sum of a bunch of objects is you get when you put those things together
Latest Articles
- A snapshot of Brian Mayne’s thinking about the ‘presence’ that underlies our essence
- An example of intellectual reflection brought to bear on ruminative reflection
- Reflection Represented in Figurine Form
- What can we be sure of?
- Review: Ghosts and Hauntings by Dennis Bardens
- The Underlying Approach to Reflection
- Driifloat
- On Science
- Review: Rupert Sheldrake – Morphic Resonance
- Benjamin Casteillo Personal Revelations
- Review: Your Brain is Boss by Dr Lynda Shaw
- Reflection: its practical purposes
- Reflection techniques; how better to reflect
- Reflection can help you understand the Unseen world
- Reflection helps an understanding of politics and international relations