This looks inter alia at whether everything must be something, and at metaphysical questions such as ‘Everything and Nothing’. Heidegger talks about ‘nothing’ or ‘all’ in his philosophy. Nothing is contradictory, ineffable and the ground of everything. Husserl also had this way of looking at things. Anything can be a thing (anything) and it can be a quantifier or a substantive, or it can be both. Parts overlap. Some objects do not exist but are postulated. The mereological sum of a bunch of objects is you get when you put those things together
Latest Articles
- BEGIN HERE
- A Conversation with Roy Maunder
- Roy Maunder on the Differences Between Eastern and Western Discipline
- Fields Related to Reflection
- Reflecting on A.I.
- Reflections In a Mirror
- International Relations and Reflection
- Awareness – A Key to Reality
- A Comparison between Eastern and Western Philosophy
- Ideas from a Tibetan Buddhist workshop on the Afterlife
- Is Humankind representative of the cosmos?
- Memories of BARRY LONG by Brian Mayne
- Introduction to Mysticism
- Reflection enhances success in business and industry
- New perspectives on Faith, the Cosmos, the physical world, politics, and international relations